In a study using genetically engineered mice, Johns Hopkins researchers have uncovered some new molecular details that appear to explain how electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) rapidly relieves severe depression in mammals, presumably including people. The molecular changes allow more communication between neurons in a specific part of the brain also known to respond to antidepressant drugs.
In a report of their study, published online on Oct. 20 inNeuropsychopharmacology,the researchers say the findings should help advance the development of treatments that do what ECT does without the risks and side effects.
“ECT is the most effective treatment available for severe and treatment-resistant depression, but it requires anesthesia and can cause side effects like memory loss,” says Irving Michael Reti, M.B.B.S., M.D., director of the Brain Stimulation Program and associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. “Figuring out how exactly ECT works on the brain is key to finding better alternatives.”
The new study extends work by Reti and his colleagues, whose research has focused recently on a gene in the mouse brain’s hippocampus that makes the protein Narp, shown to be linked to addiction and so-called “motivated behaviors” more than a decade ago, while Reti was working with Jay Baraban at Johns Hopkins.
ECT, given to depressed patients under anesthesia and after taking a muscle relaxer, sends electrical pulses to the brain through electrodes applied to the head. The electrical stimulation triggers a seizure. Repeated a few times a week for a short period, ECT eliminates depressive symptoms for an extended time in many patients.
Working with mice, Reti and others have shown previously that within a few minutes of ECT, certain genes notably including Narp are turned on in the hippocampus, a small, seahorse-shaped part of the brain in the temporal lobe that helps regulate emotions.
For the new study exploring Narp’s role in ECT, the researchers used healthy mice and mice genetically bred to lack the Narp.
Mice in both groups underwent ECT for five sessions delivered through ear clip electrodes. Separately, both types of mice got “sham” procedures without the electrical pulse as controls. Each ECT session delivered a 0.5 millisecond electrical pulse for 1 second, with a frequency of 100 Hertz and 40 milliamp current about 5 percent of the total electrical charge given to a human patient.
Next, the researchers measured the mice’s behavior using a well-known swimming test in which animals are placed in a tank filled with water while researchers measure how long they swim compared with how long they float.
A depressed mouse will spend more time floating similar to giving up on active swimming than a non-depressed mouse. In a six-minute test, healthy mice spent about 50 seconds of the last four minutes floating, whereas the mice without Narp spent about 80 seconds floating in this time frame.
The researchers say the results show that Narp is a specific target needed for ECT’s impact as an antidepressant.
In both healthy mice and mice without Narp, ECT turned on the gene c-Fos known to turn on still more genes activated by ECT within an hour after the final ECT session.
To see if Narp played a role in making these new cells in mice, the researchers injected a synthetic molecule, BrdU, to label and allow detection of newly created cells that would become neurons in the hippocampus. Both the healthy mice and the mice without Narp had three times the number of new cells in the hippocampus after ECT than the mice that were given the sham procedure.
The researchers also looked at the dendrites growing out of these new brain cells, projections that reach out and communicate with neighboring cells. They visualized the dendrites by staining them for the protein DCX, which binds to the cell’s skeleton. Some 24 hours after the last ECT session in both healthy mice and mice lacking Narp, they found that new cells in the mice lacking Narp had far fewer branches on their dendrites than cells found in the healthy mice’s hippocampus.
“What all of this tells us is that Narp seems to regulate communication with other neurons by forming new synapses, or connections, and this may be the way that, in part, it enacts its antidepressive effects following ECT,” says Reti.
The researchers tested healthy mice to see if they responded to antidepressant drugs. Using the forced swim test, they found that mice given 10 milligrams per kilogram of injected ketamine floated for about 75 seconds compared with 110 seconds for mice not given the drug. The researchers then looked in the mice without Narp to see if they responded to ketamine. Mice without Narp not given the drug floated for about 110 seconds, whereas Narp-less mice given ketamine floated for about 90 seconds.
“What this suggests is that losing Narp doesn’t affect the response to the ketamine, meaning the antidepressant could be acting through a different mechanism than ECT suggesting that there may be multiple ways to treat depression, including unknown pathways that use ECT’s mechanism,” says Reti.
Other authors on the study included Andrew Chang, Punit Vaidya, Edward Retzbach, Sunho Chung, Urian Kim, Kathryn Baselice, Alec Stepanian, Melissa Staley, Lan Xiao, Ashley Blouin, Sungho Han, JohgAh Lee, Paul Worley, Kellie Tamashiro, Kerri Martinowich, Mary Ann Wilson and Jay Baraban from Johns Hopkins; Kristen Maynard of the Lieber Institute for Brain Development and Barbara Hempstead of Weill Cornell Medical College.
The study was funded by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA016303), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS039156), the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54 HD079123) and Eric and Alison Jager.
Source : The Johns Hopkins University