Scientists are developing new strategies for keeping global temperature rises under control. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is one of the methods used to prevent CO2 from entering the atmosphere. With this technology, waste CO2 from power plants and industrial processes is captured, transported and then stored several kilometres below ground in depleted oil and gas wells or deep saline aquifers. However, the question remains: Once buried, will the CO2 stay buried? And, how safe is CCS for the environment?
These are some of the questions the EU-funded projects STEMM-CCS, ECO2 and EUROFLEETS have sought to answer. The researchers conducted a controlled CO2 release experiment at the Sleipner CO2 storage site in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea. Their aim was to determine how effectively a well leaking CO2 into the sea could be detected, and what the environmental consequences of such a leak would be. Their findings were published in the ‘International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control’.
During the study, which simulated the leakage of CO2 through abandoned wells, the gas was released at seabed level at a water depth of 82 m. A total of 40 kg of CO2 was released into the water in just under 12 hours. This corresponds to an annual leakage rate of 31 t per year, which is in the upper range of methane gas fluxes seen in abandoned wells.
Effects of a CO2 leak
The data showed that CO2 gas bubbles were completely dissolved near the seabed. While this lowered the pH value of the surrounding seawater, making it more acidic and consequently harming organisms in the area, the scientists felt that the detrimental effects were limited. Thanks to the strong bottom currents that rapidly dispersed the dissolved CO2, only local ecosystems in the well’s immediate vicinity were affected. Leakage through wells therefore has “no detrimental large-scale effects on the North Sea ecosystem,” according to co-author Dr Klaus Wallmann of ECO2 project coordinator GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel. “Thus, we tentatively conclude that it is possible to store CO2 safely in sub-seabed formations if the storage site is located in an area with a small number of leaky wells,” stated Dr Wallmann in a news item posted on the ‘ScienceDaily’ website.
STEMM-CCS (Strategies for Environmental Monitoring of Marine Carbon Capture and Storage) is conducting a second release experiment in the North Sea in May. The project will be developing sensing and monitoring techniques to detect leakages and to trigger subsequent studies on their environmental impact, if any. Alleviating concerns about the effects on marine life, lead researcher Douglas Connelly of the United Kingdom’s Natural Environment Research Council said that leaks are “very unlikely”. “There has been no measurable impact – or leakage – from the storage of CO2 at the Sleipner reservoir, for example,” Connelly explained in an interview published on the ‘Science|Business’ website earlier this month. “The use of depleted oil and gas reservoirs offers more surety around storage as they are well studied – we know the volumes that can be stored and we know the area of the seabed that overlies these sites.”
EUROFLEETS (TOWARDS AN ALLIANCE OF EUROPEAN RESEARCH FLEETS) and ECO2 (Sub-seabed CO2 Storage: Impact on Marine Ecosystems (ECO2)) ended in 2013 and 2015, respectively.